Choosing the Right Modernization Approach

When organizations decide it’s time to modernize their technology infrastructure, choosing the right approach is crucial. Modernization isn’t merely a technical upgrade; it’s a strategic business move that significantly impacts growth, agility, and long-term success. Here’s how your company can effectively begin to select the best modernization strategy tailored to your goals and challenges.

In this article, we will cover:

• Understand Your Business Goals
• Evaluate Your Current Technology Landscape
• Perform a Detailed Cost-Benefit Analysis
• Select the Right Modernization Path
• Execute Incrementally or Full Rewrite
• Conclusion

Understand Your Business Goals 

Every modernization effort should begin by clearly understanding your organization’s primary goals. As Paul Tatum from Salesforce emphasized, “By leveraging modern technologies, agencies can quickly deploy secure, customer-centric applications in weeks, instead of months or years, but to achieve this, they’ll need to prioritize IT modernization efforts that focus on their platform, integration, and security.” This insight underscores the importance of clearly defining strategic areas such as scalability, security, cost-efficiency, and innovation. Clearly defining these objectives provides a roadmap and ensures alignment across teams and stakeholders throughout the modernization process. 

Evaluate Your Current Technology Landscape 

Before planning your destination, understand your starting point. Conduct a thorough assessment of existing applications and infrastructure. Identify strengths, immediate pain points, and potential risks. Ask critical questions: Can your current system evolve sufficiently to meet future demands? Are there outdated technologies threatening your competitive stance?  

Common pitfalls during this evaluation include: 

• Overlooking hidden dependencies: Applications often have hidden or undocumented dependencies. Avoid this by thoroughly documenting and mapping all system interactions. 
• Underestimating technical debt: Companies frequently underestimate the complexity and cost of technical debt. Mitigate this by carefully auditing legacy code and infrastructure to fully understand potential risks. 
• Inadequate stakeholder involvement: Failing to involve critical stakeholders early can lead to misalignment. Engage all relevant teams and clearly communicate findings and implications from the beginning. 
• Ignoring scalability considerations: Organizations may focus too narrowly on current needs, ignoring future scalability requirements. Ensure scalability assessments are part of your evaluation process to avoid future limitations. 

Perform a Detailed Cost-Benefit Analysis 

A detailed financial analysis is essential. Look beyond upfront modernization costs and consider long-term operational savings. Factor in indirect costs, such as potential downtime, employee training, productivity impacts during transitions, and long-term maintenance implications. One way to help streamline your evaluation and gain clearer insights into your project’s return on investment is to use a ROI Calculator. On one hand, there are simple ways to compare some key performance indicators – errors and speed, for example. However, other metrics – such as employee engagement or customer satisfaction – are often more difficult to quantify. For assistance evaluating and documenting your project’s return on investment, you can reference this article, which includes a downloadable ROI calculator template and a video walkthrough. 

Select the Right Modernization Path 

Several pathways exist for modernization, each suited to different scenarios: 

The 5Rs of Modernization 

• Rehosting (Lift-and-Shift)
  • This is the lowest effort in modernization. Rehosting involves migrating applications “as-is,” with little to no changes to the code or architecture. Organizations often use this method to quickly transition applications from on-premise to cloud platforms like AWS or Azure, and gain benefits such as scalability, performance, cost-saving elasticity, and enhanced security. While this is the lowest effort it offers the least ROI and doesn’t address many of the requirements in a modernization effort. 
• Replatforming
  • Replatforming is a level of effort beyond rehosting, sometimes referred to as “lift, tinker, and shift”, and usually involves rehosting and modifying the code to be optimized specifically for the cloud. This approach allows enterprises to capture the benefits of cloud-native infrastructure while minimizing the time and complexity associated with extensive refactoring or rearchitecting. While this can strike a nice balance between rehosting and refactoring, specific challenges can make this option less desirable if you have integration issues and working with legacy systems. 
• Refactoring/Rearchitecting
  • Refactoring involves restructuring and optimizing existing code without changing its external behavior, often to improve performance and maintainability. At Shopify, Philip Müller highlighted, “Making a fundamental architecture change to a system that’s being actively worked on is in large part a people problem. We need to change the behavior of the average developer on the codebase. We need to iteratively evolve the system towards the envisioned future together.” Refactoring is appropriate for long-term projects where the ultimate return on investment justifies the initial effort and there is time to wait for those benefits to be realized. 
• Rebuilding
  • Rebuilding entails constructing applications from scratch, often using modern architectures and technologies. This approach is best suited for systems that have become so rigid, outdated, or inefficient that incremental improvements no longer provide meaningful progress. Rebuilding is often considered when a system severely limits innovation potential, has accumulated excessive technical debt, or lacks scalability to support future growth. While a complete rebuild offers the opportunity to address fundamental design flaws and adopt the latest technologies, it also carries significant risks, including extended development timelines, high costs, and potential disruptions to existing users. Success in rebuilding depends on careful planning, a clear understanding of business needs, and a phased approach that minimizes downtime and knowledge loss. 
• Replacing
  • Replacing involves substituting an existing application with a new solution, such as a SaaS product. This approach is ideal when maintaining or modernizing a legacy system is too costly or when a widely used solution meets most business needs with minimal customization. It provides immediate benefits such as vendor support, scalability, and reduced internal IT burden. However, replacement may not be viable if highly customized workflows are essential, as adapting a generic solution can be expensive and disruptive. Data migration, user retraining, and potential vendor lock-in are also key considerations. While replacing a system can streamline operations and reduce technical debt, organizations must carefully assess integration needs and long-term flexibility before committing to this approach. 

Gartner’s TIME Model 

When considering whether to refactor, rebuild, or replace a system, Gartner’s TIME Model can serve as a valuable framework to guide decision-making and help structure the modernization approach. By categorizing systems based on their current value and future viability, this model enables organizations to prioritize efforts effectively, ensuring that resources are allocated to the areas that will yield the greatest strategic impact. 

• Tolerate: Systems that work fine for now 
• Invest: Systems worth upgrading gradually 
• Migrate: Systems that need full replacement soon 
• Eliminate: Systems that are obsolete and risky 

Real-world example: To better understand how a thoughtful modernization approach can deliver real impact, explore how UDig helped a leading home builder modernize legacy applications, streamline maintenance, and create a scalable, reusable framework. [Read the client modernization story here.] 

Execute Incrementally or Full Rewrite 

Once a modernization path is selected, the next critical decision is how to execute the transition—incrementally or as a full replacement. 

Incremental Modernization 

Rather than overhauling everything at once, incremental modernization gradually replaces or refactors parts of the system while keeping critical operations running. This method is particularly useful when downtime is not an option and when legacy systems still provide essential business value. 

When to Choose Incremental Modernization 

This approach is often ideal when: 

• Business Continuity: Continuous operations with minimal downtime are required. 
• Complex Systems: The system is too large or interconnected to be replaced quickly. 
• Risk Management: Organizations have a lower risk tolerance or limited resources. 
• Cost Distribution: Spreading costs over a longer period aligns better with financial planning. 

 Pros 

• Lower Immediate Risk 
  • Smaller changes can be tested and validated quickly. 
  • Errors and issues affect only limited parts of the system, minimizing widespread disruption. 
• Easier to Validate  
  • Allows smaller releases and more focused testing, making debugging simpler and faster. 
• Early Value Delivery
  • Business stakeholders can benefit from improvements earlier, seeing tangible outcomes more quickly. 
• Better Learning and Adaptation
  • Teams can adjust their approach based on lessons learned during the process, refining strategies as they go. 

Cons 

• Complex Hybrid Systems
  • Maintaining interoperability between legacy and modernized components is complicated. 
  • Increased complexity in testing, deployment, monitoring, and management. 
• Technical Debt Risk 
  • Without careful management, there’s a chance of leaving older, problematic components in place indefinitely, thus prolonging legacy system risks. 
• Governance and Consistency 
  • Requires disciplined project governance, including clearly defined milestones, strong architectural oversight, and continuous integration to maintain consistency and avoid fragmenting the architecture.

Full Rewrite (Big Bang Approach) 

A full rewrite is the complete replacement of an existing system with a brand-new architecture. It often means building the new system from scratch, parallel to the current system, and then completely switching over once the new system is complete. 

Ideal Use Cases 

• Simpler Systems: Ideal when the system size and complexity are manageable. 
• Obsolescence: The existing technology stack is too outdated, creating considerable business risk. 
• Business Agility Needs: A sudden shift in strategy or major technology change.

Pros 

• Technical Debt Reduction 
  • The new system is built cleanly from scratch, reducing or eliminating accumulated technical debt. 
• Cleaner Architecture and Simplified Maintenance 
  • Opportunity to utilize modern frameworks, patterns, and architectures, creating a more maintainable system from the outset. 
• Future-Ready Design
  • Easier incorporation of modern technologies, tools, best practices, and architecture designs without legacy constraints. 
• Unified Vision
  • Easier to maintain consistency and vision since the entire new system is conceived holistically. 

Cons 

• High Initial Cost
  • Significant upfront investment of financial resources and human effort. 
  • Risk of significant loss if the project fails to deliver expected outcomes. 
• Business Disruption 
  • Increased potential downtime or performance issues, especially during the cut-over to the new system. 
  • Higher impact if the new solution encounters unforeseen issues post-deployment. 
• Scope Creep and Delay Risk
  • Tendency to expand the project’s scope, prolonging timelines, adding complexity, and increasing the risk of delays. 
  • Need for rigorous scope management. 
• Limited Adaptability
  • If business or technology requirements change during development, it may be difficult or costly to adjust the approach mid-project. 

Conclusion 

Choosing your modernization approach is fundamentally strategic. Clearly aligning your technology strategy with business objectives, assessing your current environment, and carefully planning your path forward positions your organization for sustainable success. Modernization is an ongoing process rather than a one-time event; continually reassessing and adjusting your strategy as business needs evolve ensures that your technology remains a competitive asset rather than becoming a liability. By thoughtfully navigating the trade-offs and complexities involved, your organization can confidently leverage modernization to drive innovation, agility, and sustained growth.